On Tuesday December 3rd we met with Emily Bergsland at UCSF. They do things differently at UCSF. Though she is fairly senior there, she wasn't knowledgeable about any clinical trials at UCSF. She said she would refer me to the Clinical Trial group to discuss any available options. Other than that, she said that if I was her patient she would likely try to put me on the first chemo I was on when this all began. That was the cocktail called "FOLFOX" and contained the drug Oxaliplatin which caused the cold sensitivity in my hands and throat. Or she said that it might be worth trying Regorafenib, which is a drug for metastatic colon cancer. I've been told by some oncologists that they don't like to use it because the side effects are pretty harsh (hand-foot syndrome and fatigue) but the average time it extends a patient's life is about 6 weeks which doesn't make it seem worth it. But she said that some patients respond very well to it and it's worth a try.
On Thursday December 5th, David and I went to Stanford to speak with their Radiation Oncologist. He is the person who would be able to perform a possible CyberKnife procedure. We got confused and thought this was our Interventional Radiologist appointment but when we got there we realized that we were meeting with a Radiation Oncologist. We had already met with a RO at El Camino Hospital so this turned out to be an accidental 2nd opinion. He said he wouldn't bother CyberKnifing the spot on the psoas muscle near my left kidney. They all say that little tumor is so miniscule and it's not likely to do any harm for a long time. It would have to grow much larger. Since it's not causing any problems now, leaving it alone for now would be a reasonable choice. The RO at El Camino did say that if I did any local treatments in the liver to reduce the tumors there then it would make sense to do something with this one as well. But it doesn't make sense to do this and not the liver. Also, leaving it in place might give us something to keep an eye on, like a marker to see how chemotherapy drugs are working, or not working. The overall opinion of the RO at Stanford was to leave it and not do CyberKnife at this time. The RO at El Camino said he would go either way. If I want to remove it then I can. If I want to leave it then it's an option too. I would lean towards removing it unless my oncologist sees a value in leaving it as a marker.
On Friday December 6th, David and I returned to UCSF to meet with the clinical trial people. He said there are two possible trial options for me. One trial is studying the efficacy of a drug I've already had (Lisinopril) "wrapped in a soap bubble". They believe the Lisinopril delivered this way can penetrate the tumor cells more effectively. The other trial involves two oral drugs. These two drugs would block activity on two pathways that the tumor cells use to grow and multiply. The thing about this set of drugs is that they would target pathways that haven't been targeted in me before, so my body, or the tumor cells, haven't set up resistance to them. The doctor said that there will likely only be a few slots available and he won't know how many until next week. It sounded like there wouldn't be much of a chance for me, but time will tell. To be honest, I'm not interested in the first study. I would possibly be interested in the second study. I could try it and if it doesn't work, drop out and do other things that are always available to me - to be described next.
Yesterday (Thursday December 12th) David and I returned to Stanford to speak with an Interventional Radiologist. If I were to choose radioembolization, chemoembolization, or ablation (cryo or radio frequency) then this would be his job. He explained all of these procedures and discussed the pros and cons of each. There are videos of him explaining these on YouTube. If you are interested, they are here:
Actually he is in the first video. The other two videos are different people but he would be able to do any of the procedures. As an aside: He (Dr. Sze) is the senior doctor in his practice.
Dr. Sze told me that since the liver has already had some radiation from the previous CyberKnife procedures this might not be an option for me. Once the liver receives a certain level of radiation it starts to die. And it has memory. All radiation counts, even past doses. He actually said that the parts of my liver that received the CyberKnife are probably dead because that radiation was higher than the limit the liver can tolerate. He also said that a couple of the tumors are on the edge of my liver, making radioembolization dangerous for the other organs nearby which are very sensitive to radiation. Finally he said that my tumors are very small and may not be so greedy and "suck up" all of the radioactive beads so much, meaning the beads would also go to healthy tissue. He feels that giving me this treatment might cause liver failure.
Ablation therapies might work but would not be his first choice.
Chemoembolization would be his first choice. He said chemoembolization isn't a one-stop shop, that you have to do it several times. He has performed this up to 20 times on a patient without loss of liver function. It's designed to reduce the tumors that are present but won't stop new ones from popping up. So, it is to be repeated 3-9 months again to take care of new growth. He said that he would use Irinotican-saturated beads again since they did show effectiveness the first time I did this, last spring.
On Tuesday the 17th I should know if there is a potential slot for me with the oral targeted drug trial. I have an appointment to see my oncologist on that same day, at 4:30. I will take all of this information to him and he can help me decide which pieces of the puzzle are the best choice for me. The pathways I see are:
- Do the clinical trial and nothing else for now. They wouldn't want any other therapies to be done because the point of the trial is to see if the drugs are effective against the tumor. If I embolize or ablate them then they have nothing to watch.
- Do the chemoembolization followed by systemic chemotherapy, of my oncologist's choice. The CyberKnife of the psoas muscle tumor would be discussed with him, and could also be done further down the road.
- If I get on the clinical trial and don't see any effectiveness then I could always stop it and do pathway number 2 at any time.
"Hello Mrs. Coleman. We received additional records on 11/20/2013. Your case is currently still in review. I will contact you early next week once your review is complete and we have established an appointment for you."
That was the last communication I received. "Early next week" came and went already - he sent me that note three weeks ago today. He has ignored two emails and a voice mail message from me since then. Yesterday I called to complain to someone and she said she would be talking to either his or her own supervisor. He actually hasn't entered any notes into my file since November 19th, she said. He is supposed to document everything but it looks like I don't exist to him anymore. I don't actually think we will end up going there but we will see what, if anything, they come back with. I am due to take a trip to Texas so maybe I'll go to see what they have to say if I don't get into the UCSF clinical trial.


.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
















